 |
| Datuk Seri Khairuddin Abu Hassan |
Court throws out Khairuddin’s suit against ex-PM over emergency
BERNAMA
24/8/2021
KUALA LUMPUR – The high court here today allowed the government’s application to strike out former Jasin parliamentary constituency coordinator Datuk Seri Khairuddin Abu Hassan’s legal action against former prime minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin over the emergency proclamation.
The action was taken to challenge Muhyiddin’s decision to advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the proclamation of emergency to contain the Covid-19 pandemic.
Lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, representing Khairuddin as the plaintiff, said judge Datuk Noorin Badaruddin made the decision after hearing submissions from the parties in virtual proceedings.
“The court allowed the government’s application to strike out the whole
Loading...
originating summons filed by my client,” he said, adding that he would take further instruction from Khairuddin on whether to appeal against today’s outcome.
Senior federal counsel S. Narkunavathy acted for Muhyiddin and the government as the first and second defendants.
On February 17, Muhyiddin and the government filed an application to strike out Khairuddin’s suit on grounds that the suit was scandalous, frivolous and vexatious, and an abuse of the court process.
Khairuddin filed the suit on January 18, asking the court to decide on four legal and constitutional issues over the emergency proclamation.
On June 23, the high court dismissed Khairuddin’s application to refer four constitutional questions to the Federal Court regarding the declaration of emergency.
On January 12, Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri’ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah had proclaimed a Covid-19 emergency, to be enforced until August 1, as a proactive measure to contain the worsening pandemic in Malaysia.
Muhyiddin that same day said that the cabinet had advised the king to proclaim the emergency under Clause (1) of Article 150 of the federal constitution effective January 11 to August 1.
Clause (1) of Article 150 states that if the king is satisfied that a grave emergency exists whereby security, or economic life, or public order in the federation or any part thereof is threatened, he may issue a proclamation of emergency, making therein a declaration to that effect.
Senior federal counsel S. Narkunavathy acted for Muhyiddin and the government as the first and second defendants.
On February 17, Muhyiddin and the government filed an application to strike out Khairuddin’s suit on grounds that the suit was scandalous, frivolous and vexatious, and an abuse of the court process.
Khairuddin filed the suit on January 18, asking the court to decide on four legal and constitutional issues over the emergency proclamation.
On June 23, the high court dismissed Khairuddin’s application to refer four constitutional questions to the Federal Court regarding the declaration of emergency.
On January 12, Yang di-Pertuan Agong Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri’ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah had proclaimed a Covid-19 emergency, to be enforced until August 1, as a proactive measure to contain the worsening pandemic in Malaysia.
Muhyiddin that same day said that the cabinet had advised the king to proclaim the emergency under Clause (1) of Article 150 of the federal constitution effective January 11 to August 1.
Clause (1) of Article 150 states that if the king is satisfied that a grave emergency exists whereby security, or economic life, or public order in the federation or any part thereof is threatened, he may issue a proclamation of emergency, making therein a declaration to that effect.
Loading...
